That's like saying you shouldn't be mad at someone who attempted to murder you because they failed. There's a reason we have a crime called "attempted murder". You may find the wikipedia article on "Inchoate offense" interesting, specifically the section on Impossibility[1].
1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inchoate_offense#Impossibility
Re:Rationality: From AI to Zombies
by ciphergoth on Saturday March 21, 2015 @10:54AM
(#9242871)
If I learned that a co-worker believed that nuts were invariably fatal to me and gone on to hide some in my food, the nuts would do me no harm but I would still take the whole incident seriously.
Re:Rationality: From AI to Zombies
by convexfunction on Friday March 20, 2015 @08:51PM
(#9241482)
I meant "might be real" according to generic-you in that statement. Someone being wrong doesn't make information hazards in general disappear.
But... for "might be real" to be valid at all, you have to buy into the Roko's basilisk concept in the first place.
If you don't, there's nothing to get upset about.