Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by mikexstudios on Thursday March 19, 2015 @01:09PM
(#9233284)
Really neat project. One suggestion: Put bitrate and filesize information in search results so that the user can make a decision based on the quality of the file.
Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by bduerst on Thursday March 19, 2015 @12:36PM
(#9233064)
This might be tangental, but why isn't there an ISBN equivalent for other media (e.g. movies, music)?
It would make distributed streaming services like this much more powerful, but would also allow copyright holders to have more control over their content.
Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by derobert on Thursday March 19, 2015 @06:00PM
(#9234875)
There are. For sound recordings, there is the International Standard Recording Code (ISRC). For the musical work (of which there may be many recordings) there is an International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC). For an entire album, at least in CD format, there is a Media Catalog Number (MCN). (CDs also typically contain an ISRC for each track.) Albums often have a label catalog number as well.
There are also community identifiers, such as MusicBrainz IDs.
Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by hias on Thursday March 19, 2015 @11:24AM
(#9232568)
"(run by an entity not affiliated with rivulet.audio)" So it is after all ;-)
Shouldn't you mention that you could get sued for using this service? A lot of people did not know how PopcornTime worked, used it and get sued because of that...
Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by lbotos on Thursday March 19, 2015 @11:56AM
(#9232823)
I never used popcorn time (don't watch enough movies/netflix for those I do) but do you have examples of "a lot of people getting sued"? I read a lot of media coverage on PCT but never saw those stories.
Re:Show HN: Rivulet – a music player for torrents
by soylentcola on Thursday March 19, 2015 @11:29AM
(#9232611)
Yeah, listening to unlicensed music on Grooveshark or Youtube doesn't put the user at risk but if it makes you part of the swarm, you're technically participating in the unlicensed distribution and can be sued/fined.
It would make distributed streaming services like this much more powerful, but would also allow copyright holders to have more control over their content.
There are also community identifiers, such as MusicBrainz IDs.
Not sure what there is for movies, however.
Shouldn't you mention that you could get sued for using this service? A lot of people did not know how PopcornTime worked, used it and get sued because of that...
It's actually a pretty strategic way to demo a technology that would get shut down in civil court.