You read plenty of comments about always "write tests first" or 100% test coverage, ignoring the fact that many businesses don't have the resources, and just want something quickly. Even if it is a bit buggy, the something that works for 98% of the cases today is better than something that works for 100% of cases in two months time.
I stared filling in an application form the other day:
do you prefer A) I prefer "standard" solutions because they work and are easier to implement and maintain. B) I prefer to create from scratch because it fits better the needs and offers better performance.
Without a context this question is entirely pointless to me. And I will be judged on it? There people obviously have their ideals and I am going to be judged on them. There is no "it depends" in the answers.
Questions like that are like being asked if you prefer: A) A backhoe, because it gets the job done faster. B) A shovel, because you have finer control
without being told what it is that you're actually digging.
absolutely not surprising given that there is even a pretty popular language with indent base syntax out there.