Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank
by eridius on Sunday March 15, 2015 @07:28PM
(#9208710)
What I want to know is why the FBI even cared in the slightest that Jason broke Brian's wifi for an hour. I feel like there must be something missing to this story to explain that.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank
by acdha on Sunday March 15, 2015 @08:12PM
(#9208850)
Indeed – in the past, even if you suffered actual damages the first thing the FBI would ask was whether they were over $50K because they didn't touch anything under that amount. I wonder if most of the appeal was a case where all of the participants are known & local – they're thinking a quick, easy prosecution and some press to pad someone's annual review.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank
by alt2319 on Monday March 16, 2015 @12:50AM
(#9209934)
Sometimes they prosecute these cases just to gain experience in prosecuting them.
Brian stopped Jason from receiving emails, then Jason broke Brian's wifi for an hour, then Brian calls the FBI.
Do these two have previous history? Was there some sort of escalation between the second and the third event?