News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by nickodell on Sunday March 15, 2015 @07:01PM (#9208593)
I feel like there's something missing from this story.

Brian stopped Jason from receiving emails, then Jason broke Brian's wifi for an hour, then Brian calls the FBI.

Do these two have previous history? Was there some sort of escalation between the second and the third event?

Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by eridius on Sunday March 15, 2015 @07:28PM (#9208710)
What I want to know is why the FBI even cared in the slightest that Jason broke Brian's wifi for an hour. I feel like there must be something missing to this story to explain that.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by acdha on Sunday March 15, 2015 @08:12PM (#9208850)
Indeed – in the past, even if you suffered actual damages the first thing the FBI would ask was whether they were over $50K because they didn't touch anything under that amount. I wonder if most of the appeal was a case where all of the participants are known & local – they're thinking a quick, easy prosecution and some press to pad someone's annual review.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by alt2319 on Monday March 16, 2015 @12:50AM (#9209934)
Sometimes they prosecute these cases just to gain experience in prosecuting them.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by argc on Sunday March 15, 2015 @07:07PM (#9208612)
Good question. Who calls the FBI over something like that? Granted, I haven't heard his side of the story, but with the information I have now I don't ever want to be friends with Brian.
Re:Petition Against Felony Charge for WiFi Prank by takeda on Sunday March 15, 2015 @11:25PM (#9209638)
Based on other comments & Occam's Razor tells me that Brian banned Jason's email account then Brian started to DDoS Brian's WiFi at which point Brian contacted FBI.