Give before you take – thoughts on the best way to implement a free trial

Re:Give before you take – thoughts on the best way to implem... by dprasad on Thursday March 12, 2015 @01:34PM (#9192357)

We've been trying to answer the same question. We found that giving a free option forever has worked best for us so far. Free to start and free to use as your company grows.

http://www.thesnaffu.com

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Give before you take – thoughts on the best way to implem... by yangmeyer on Friday March 13, 2015 @05:20AM (#9196254)

For Gemba, this could mean limiting the number of connected Git repositories. I decided against this because:

(1) some new users try out Gemba with a test repository, and needing to remove it to free up a slot for the "real" repo seems like unnecessary friction;

(2) some designers work full-time on a single product (e.g. in a startup) and would get loads of value (pushing hundreds of assets) for free and might never need to unlock unlimited repos.

Thoughts?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Give before you take – thoughts on the best way to implem... by pandler on Thursday March 12, 2015 @02:20PM (#9192685)

Sigh... I wish I had seen this about 2 years ago. Not so useful for me anymore since moving away from native app development, but that graphic of the manual QA process made me groan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Give before you take – thoughts on the best way to implem... by dprasad on Thursday March 12, 2015 @04:33PM (#9193684)

Definitely -- its a true story and anyone in QA knows that pain -- we've had a great response so far.

[ Parent | on HN ]