News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by Gustomaximus on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @12:56AM (#9182654)
Humans have weaknesses that can be abused. This is clearly the case in gambling. The government must protect in some areas. For example with financial advice, there are countless cases of people giving inappropriate financial advice to the elderly, even getting them to sign away their property while dying in hospitals. Sure it easy to say 'and gasp let people do what they want with their property'. But what about this scenario? Would you be OK if that was your relatives being manipulated on their deathbed to give money to a previous stranger cause it is what they want to do with their property at that moment in their life. Or, back to gambling, is it fair on the children of the father/mother who gamble away their pay check each month leaving the family destitute?

Above is more extreme but real examples to clarify a point. In my mind saying people can do what they want with their property is overly simplistic and assumes a more perfect world than the reality.

Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by bmmayer1 on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:20AM (#9182830)
The government is in a much better position to protect people from fraud if it isn't the one perpetrating the fraud in the first place.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by SilasX on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:23AM (#9182837)
>Or, back to gambling, is it fair on the children of the father/mother who gamble away their pay check each month leaving the family destitute?

However bad it might be to prey on people by trying to trick them into gambling, it's a trillion times better than just taking their money (the other way of raising revenues).

Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by umanwizard on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @03:11AM (#9182951)
why?
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by SilasX on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @03:33AM (#9182998)
Because in one case you can opt out.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by ceejayoz on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @09:16AM (#9183866)
Gambling addicts can't opt-out very easily, and it causes them to pay tax rates frequently higher than 100% of their incomes.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by SilasX on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @10:55AM (#9184365)
It's easier for addicts to opt out of gambling than me to opt out of taxation, and you can be treated for addiction but not taxation.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De... by Domenic_S on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @12:56PM (#9185068)
Don't know why you're being downvoted, you're right.