Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De...
by bmmayer1 on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:20AM
(#9182830)
The government is in a much better position to protect people from fraud if it isn't the one perpetrating the fraud in the first place.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De...
by SilasX on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:23AM
(#9182837)
>Or, back to gambling, is it fair on the children of the father/mother who gamble away their pay check each month leaving the family destitute?
However bad it might be to prey on people by trying to trick them into gambling, it's a trillion times better than just taking their money (the other way of raising revenues).
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De...
by umanwizard on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @03:11AM
(#9182951)
why?
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De...
by SilasX on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @03:33AM
(#9182998)
Because in one case you can opt out.
Re:Calling the Oregon Lottery's Bluff After Poker Machine De...
by ceejayoz on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @09:16AM
(#9183866)
Gambling addicts can't opt-out very easily, and it causes them to pay tax rates frequently higher than 100% of their incomes.
Above is more extreme but real examples to clarify a point. In my mind saying people can do what they want with their property is overly simplistic and assumes a more perfect world than the reality.