News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gigaom Closes Down by mikeleeorg on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:52AM (#9176093)
And on to of that, Gigaom tried the shift away from ads to subscriptions:

Instead, we opted to take the road less traveled — subscription revenues. [1]

Which still did not bring in enough revenue.

[1] https://gigaom.com/2014/02/20/now-that-gigaom-is-all-grown-u...

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by Steko on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:16AM (#9176170)
It's not advertising that's the problem as many in the comments seem to think; it's the shitty type of ads these 90s websites were all built around.

The recent Marissa Mayer piece in Medium [1] made much of the fact that her big accomplishment so far was transitioning from the old dying Banner ads model to a mobile/video/social/fake content friendly model.

Also consider this bit from buzzfeed [2] which I first saw from stratechery's great article [3] on them.

The banner ad, whose decline Farhad Manjoo recently celebrated, was also born during this era and created a business model in which clicks are tied directly to dollars — something many people assume is still how all online publishers make their money. But BuzzFeed has never sold a banner, and I couldn't even tell you how many monthly page views we get. And so our business model at least moderates that incentive to drag every last click out of our audience.

[1] https://medium.com/backchannel/marissa-mayer-has-completed-s...

[2] http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/why-buzzfeed-doesnt-do-clic...

[3] http://stratechery.com/2015/buzzfeed-important-news-organiza...

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by ilamont on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:06AM (#9176143)
I had no idea their headcount was 70. It would be hard to maintain such a large staff unless research + events + advertising + other were doing really, really well.