News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ZFS Deduplication by atamyrat on Monday November 02, 2009 @01:20PM (#917437)
Why it wouldn't be useful?

While it might be true for some compression formats/programs, it is not the case for .tar.*, as the directory is archived to the single file first (tar), and then compressed. So if you have similarities within 2 different files, that will be exploited.

I think to make something work for "large blocks" that already does a good job for "small chunks" is just finding the right values for parameters of compression algorithm used.

Re:ZFS Deduplication by bensummers on Monday November 02, 2009 @01:23PM (#917445)
It's not a useful measure because it's not the same thing at all. Dedup only works if the block is aligned to a ZFS block size. Compression will find blocks which have no particular alignment.
Re:ZFS Deduplication by atamyrat on Monday November 02, 2009 @01:43PM (#917514)
If they were same thing, you'd get the exact result, but not an approximation.

tar.x will compress chunks of data that is smaller than zfs block size. ZFS dedup + ZFS compression will compress them as well, so what's the problem?