News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pixie: A sweet Clojure-ish language by davidw on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:38AM (#9170022)
> S-expressions are uniform in that they all look the same way.

If you treat the language as a user interface to your computer, shouldn't things that do different things have different appearances, to help you distinguish them at a glance?

Re:Pixie: A sweet Clojure-ish language by mateuszf on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:52AM (#9170062)
The braces become "invisible" after some training. Different elements of the program are distingishable. "+" is different from "if", which is different from "42".
Re:Pixie: A sweet Clojure-ish language by davidw on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:08AM (#9170109)
It's all about people, so there are likely not cut and dried answers, but I know I have always found C style code a bit easier to read than Lisp style code. Part of this may be due to other conventions, such as larger indents in C code.

Like you say, with training, the differences are probably not that big a deal, but I don't think they are something to completely ignore, either.

Re:Pixie: A sweet Clojure-ish language by atratus on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:06AM (#9170098)
the point is to free yourself to focus on semantics rather than endlessly learning syntax
Re:Pixie: A sweet Clojure-ish language by doodpants on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:30PM (#9172306)
Could you clarify? In what language(s) is the learning of syntax "endless"?