News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by benihana on Sunday March 08, 2015 @11:35AM (#9165879)
>People who get caught doing this need to be prosecuted, and if convicted, labeled as sexual criminals and placed on a register.

Ridiculous. Maybe we should prosecute people who talk about overthrowing the government on twitter with treason - they're threats! And safety is important!

These threats on the internet aren't acceptable, but neither is your reaction to them. There is a vast difference between threatening someone and actually doing something, and the way our criminal justice system treats sexual crimes borders on cruel and unusual.

You're saying that someone should have the rest of their life ruined because they made a lewd threat on the internet? We've all heard the story of the kid who went streaking on a dare but happened to be near a playground so now he's labeled a sexual predator for the rest of his life. Do you really think that is a good response to this kind of thing?

>As a father myself, this kind of behaviour makes me sick and I cannot understand people who feel they need to defend these kinds of sick comments.

Punishing someone won't ease the anxiety you feel about the safety of your kids; there will always be something else waiting to ruin their innocence. You probably confuse people saying your reaction to these comments is extreme with people defending the comments. Regardless, you want to label someone a sexual predator so that you can feel better about the fact that you're scared for your kids. That is disgusting and scarier to me than anonymous threats to my family on the internet.

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by intortus on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:05PM (#9165998)
I think you're engaging in the common fallacy of dismissing things that happen on the internet as "not real." It's long past time we, as a society, grew out of such childish thinking.
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by gk1 on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:44PM (#9166142)
As parent pointed out, these things occur in "real life" and are no less extreme. Streaking, being underage and sexting, having consensual relationships with someone slightly younger but under the age of consent, etc.
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by je_bailey on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:26PM (#9166075)
You read his statement different then I did. He's not saying that people who makes these statements be labelled as sex offenders. He's saying that people who make these statements be brought to task. If a law has been violated, then charged, and if the court determines there is reason to label them as a sex offender, then so be it.
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by gk1 on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:40PM (#9166128)
From grandparent:

> ...labeled as sexual criminals and placed on a register.

I understand you're pointing out the fact that grandparent said "if convicted," but parent's point is that _even if convicted_, being put on a registry for the rest of your life is extreme.

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by junto on Sunday March 08, 2015 @03:59PM (#9166974)
Nice misquote.

..and if convicted..

The case in point relates to harassment and threats of rape here.

What part of that isn't illegal exactly?

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by chris_wot on Sunday March 08, 2015 @01:12PM (#9166234)
Streaking near a playground without knowing of it and threatening to rape someone's daughter are completely different things. Telling anyone that they want their daughter to bleed into their underwear because you raped them is sickening, intimidating and frankly sexual violence.

Since when did this become acceptable?

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by mindslight on Sunday March 08, 2015 @02:04PM (#9166448)
It's not acceptable. This doesn't mean it needs to be illegal.

Schilling took a stand and it seems like he got decent justice as it is. Why the knee jerk reaction that more laws must be needed?

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by Dylan16807 on Sunday March 08, 2015 @01:45PM (#9166354)
Hold your horses. There are many crimes that don't put people on a life-ruining sexual predator list. Murder for example. That doesn't make them 'acceptable'.

I don't think this crime should go on that special list. I think a reasonable maximum for this crime is a few months in prison, similar to misdemeanor battery.

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by chris_wot on Sunday March 08, 2015 @02:27PM (#9166549)
I don't think the register is justifiable at all, to be honest. We don't have it where I live (Australia) and we don't have higher levels of sexual assault than the U.S. (our rates are still too high).

If that was the point you were making, I apologise as I misunderstood you.

Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by Dylan16807 on Sunday March 08, 2015 @02:50PM (#9166646)
I wasn't making that point in this specific post, but I agree. It's a 'tough on crime' measure that doesn't actually help things.
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by chris_wot on Sunday March 08, 2015 @07:30PM (#9167870)
"Tough on crime" almost never works. Appreciate your comments :-)
Re:Curt Schilling Fights Back Against Daughter’s Twitter Trolls by junto on Sunday March 08, 2015 @04:03PM (#9166989)
The examples include threats of rape against his underage daughter. How on earth do people here find that acceptable? Would it be acceptable if she was 16, 15, 12..?

It wouldn't be acceptable if she was 30 or 90.