Re:Google Chromium drops support for Linux 3.16 and earlier
by gsnedders on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:49AM
(#9164729)
Chrome did? IE7 shipped with pretty tight sandboxing in 2006 — and Chrome was only announced in 2008!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Chromium drops support for Linux 3.16 and earlier
by greggman on Sunday March 08, 2015 @05:00AM
(#9165055)
well let's see. in 2014 there were 214 code exploits in IE vs 4 in Chrome. I don't think IE's sandbox can really be considered tight
http://www.cvedetails.com/product/9900/Microsoft-Internet-Ex...
http://www.cvedetails.com/product/15031/Google-Chrome.html?v...
Re:Google Chromium drops support for Linux 3.16 and earlier
by throwawaykf05 on Sunday March 08, 2015 @10:18AM
(#9165642)
Still doesn't change the fact that Chrome did not "pioneer" sandboxing.
Re:Google Chromium drops support for Linux 3.16 and earlier
by xeromal on Sunday March 08, 2015 @11:54AM
(#9165953)
If the pioneer dies before he gets to california, he doesn't get the credit.
Re:Google Chromium drops support for Linux 3.16 and earlier
by strcat on Sunday March 08, 2015 @12:14PM
(#9166035)
There is no Windows sandbox (including the Chromium one) that's comparable to the quality of Chromium's Linux implementation.
Note that seccomp is a layer on top of the layer-1 sandbox implementation based on a chroot and namespaces. There is no equivalent to the layer-2 sandbox used to protect against kernel vulnerabilities on other platforms.