Re:Google seems to have broken email forwarding
by TeMPOraL on Thursday March 05, 2015 @12:29PM
(#9152258)
It's all about cost/benefit analysis. Maintaining an e-mail server and not getting overwhelmed by spam is hard; making sure you your e-mails will be received is even harder. Most of small businesses or organizations simply don't have resources to do that, if you count in the value lost when business e-mails get flagged as spam.
Decentralization is cool and all, but until we have some kind of self-contained, easy to deploy and maintain solution for e-mail servers, it's hard to me to recommend anything other than GMail to people - especially that typical small company or organization has a lifespan that's shorter than Google, so they don't get any important benefit from decentralization.
Re:Google seems to have broken email forwarding
by danieldk on Thursday March 05, 2015 @01:27PM
(#9152766)
it's hard to me to recommend anything other than GMail to people
There are other companies that offer e-mail services, without the embrace, expand, and extinguish strategy that Google seems to follow these days.
Re:Google seems to have broken email forwarding
by TeMPOraL on Thursday March 05, 2015 @01:34PM
(#9152814)
I haven't checked the new Outlook recently; maybe it's good. But all others that I know offer subpar service and honestly, look like crap. UX is important. For example, I cringe whenever someone makes me to use Roundcube-based webmail.
Re:Google seems to have broken email forwarding
by larrymcp on Thursday March 05, 2015 @02:20PM
(#9153173)
Yeah Roundcube's look definitely needs some help. Last year I did choose Roundcube for our webmail, but I spent several days altering its appearance so that it would look semi-professional.
I started with their new theme called "Larry" and then corrected the fonts, colors, graphics, and certain element sizing decisions.
I don't disagree. E-mail is a mess. Still, on the whole, for any person or organization with modest technical chops, I feel the freedom and decentralization (which is a positive for the entire ecosystem) is reason alone for retaining control by self-hosting.