It might be fun to do something like this with Chinese characters - similarly compact, but less visually noisy, more obvious to a Chinese or Japanese speaker, and more expressive due to having many more characters to serve as variable names.

0替始写1减写1同迄替倍採0同迄替落

> Disadvantages: None.

Well, I'm convinced.

Neat. Any reason not to use 0️⃣1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣9️⃣?

wtf are those

>ef b8 8f e2 83 a3 bs

Emoji. http://imgur.com/KG23JnK

In order to avoid aving to put ugly digits in the middle of the code, I suggest removing their support and using instead a single instruction to put 1 on the stack. By using numerical operators, it becomes easy to have any number (1 1 + 1 - would be one, 1 1 + would be two, 1 1 + 1 + would be three).

Also, the multiplication operator appears blank here.

I'm confused as to why they use 'real' digits rather than the emoji keycaps like 1️⃣2️⃣9️⃣. Bonus points for representing 🔟 in a single character.

There's also EmojiLisp: http://emojilisp.com/

I wonder if there's a programming language that makes a program look like a poem or a regular article?

Shakespeare might interest you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_%28programming_lang...

Sample:

[Enter Juliet]

Hamlet:

Thou art as sweet as the sum of the sum of Romeo and his horse and his black cat! Speak thy mind!

[Exit Juliet]

lol. This is awesome. Thank you!