Re:Nest Protect is a terrible buggy product
by jrockway on Saturday February 14, 2015 @02:04AM
(#9048975)
I think there is a small faction of anti-Google readers on HN, and then a larger set of people that don't care one way or the other, taking each story at face value. I know there are quite a few of the anti-Google faction that follow me around on HN and try to drag me into arguments about Google in completely unrelated stories. That's why I don't comment much anymore.
With that in mind, and given that HN's ranking algorithm is secret, it seems unfair to accuse a hivemind of intentionally messing with the algorithm to suppress commentary about their employer. Maybe it's a bug. Maybe it's working as intended.
Could one of the HN admins comment? Do you guys notice a lot of Google-related stories getting flagged?
Re:Nest Protect is a terrible buggy product
by dang on Saturday February 14, 2015 @04:07AM
(#9049160)
> Do you guys notice a lot of Google-related stories getting flagged?
Not particularly. Controversial stories reliably get lots of upvotes and flags. As far as I can tell, one could replace "Google" with "*" and the same statements would hold.
I'm going to detach this subthread as off-topic now.
And the upthread point about this being a Google employee seem to miss the actual content which is highly critical of Google. And there's absolutely a history of threads highly critical of Google getting flagged down on HN.