News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's New Market by peteretep on Thursday February 12, 2015 @07:27PM (#9042210)
OED lists as:

    > Belonging to an earlier period, no longer in common use,
    > though still retained either by individuals, or
    > generally, for special purposes, poetical, liturgical
If "no longer in common use" or "for special purposes" doesn't mean incorrect in an entirely consensus-driven language, what does? It gives a motivating example of "obleege", for oblige, which I note my spell-checker has helpfully underlined in red.
Re:Apple's New Market by simonh on Saturday February 14, 2015 @05:06AM (#9049258)
Nothing about 'not common' or 'special purposes' implies 'incorrect'. There are many perfectly good words and phrases in English that are not commonly used or are only used for special purposes, but that in no way makes them incorrect.