Go has basically none of the mechanisms for sanely 
    creating composable complexity that Scala has. It makes 
    me really grossed out to think about something with the 
    complexity that Finagle exposes as a Go library. Go is 
    all about small, sturdy tools that work for most of the 
    cases most of the time and that compose well with each 
    other - IF - they are built into the standard library. 
    
    And if it's not, have fun spending your time writing 
    uni-typed interfaces for any kind of interop with 
    desired complexity. Go is great for writing dead simple 
    byte slingers, pipelines that will be rigid in the most 
    dynamic possibility, guns that shoot JS and interact 
    with services, etc. That's simply not Finagle.