Re:Banks Paid $32.6B in Bonuses Amid U.S. Bailout (2009)
by toyg on Monday February 09, 2015 @07:17PM
(#9024680)
I'm not saying I agree with that line, I'm saying that this is what the (Bush II) government was signaling at the time. (Which for them was likely true -- losing Lehman, Goldman and AIG in a month would have destroyed a world of wealthy executives.)
Greece is another matter; the problem there was not with the bailout, but with stupid terms imposed by the troika to cover debts. In fact, if the troika had behaved with Greece in the same way the US government did with US banks (putting up cash right away, no questions asked), Greece would not have suffered what it did.
Re:Banks Paid $32.6B in Bonuses Amid U.S. Bailout (2009)
by danielweber on Monday February 09, 2015 @01:05PM
(#9022578)
At the time, I supported letting Lehman die. Take your medicine, screw-ups!
I was wrong. It's largely regarded as a bone-headed move today. It was the start of the meltdown.
Wait a minute, just a minute. The way I see it, the US government didn't disarm a nuclear bomb, it just saved Goldman Sachs (and it's creditors AIG) and let Lehman Brothers die. Smart choice by Henry Paulson, I'd expect no less by a former senior GS manager.
It used tax-payer money and I'd be angry if I were an American. I'm angry at the Greek government who did the same thing (among many other things), but then again. I live in Greece, I get a choice (More than 30 parties run in the elections last time I checked...). In the US I get the feeling that you can vote Democrats or Republicans. Largely disputable policies like this, are never going to change.