News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UK to allow babies from three people by jessaustin on Tuesday February 03, 2015 @09:57PM (#8995080)
...many couples are oblivious to the existence of modern NFP...

Gosh, why wouldn't their fertility doctors have told them about it? b^)

Re:UK to allow babies from three people by tomp on Wednesday February 04, 2015 @04:34AM (#8996001)
Because they can't charge as much.
Re:UK to allow babies from three people by ceejayoz on Wednesday February 04, 2015 @10:23AM (#8997263)
That's the same argument made by conspiracy theorists claiming pharmaceutical companies suppress cancer cures, and it's just as bullshit.

My infertility treatment involved a cheapest-first approach, and that's entirely standard. We were told about charting cycles for best chances, analyses were done, some drugs were tried, and we were able to get pregnant via IUI for about $300 total. IVF is pretty much the final option, tried after everything else fails.

Re:UK to allow babies from three people by tomp on Wednesday February 04, 2015 @10:48AM (#8997469)
Just because idiots use an argument doesn't mean the argument is stupid.

30 seconds of Googling brings up this article [1] (a secondary source, primary sources are Bloomberg and Washington Post), discussing the impression that doctors are performing/suggesting unnecessary, yet expensive surgeries/treatments. Even if it turns out not to be true (after proper research), it's an argument worth considering in any situation that involves financial incentives not aligned with the desired outcome.

[1]: http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/unneces...