Re:Nike+ FuelBand SE BLE Protocol Reversed
by evilsocket on Friday January 30, 2015 @09:41AM
(#8972193)
author here ... it's not THAT easy, that specific piece of code was highly obfuscated by proguard ( you know the a.class, b.class, c.class thing? XD ) and everything made me think about the "correct" algorithm, still I can't find where that 0xFF... is being set :P
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nike+ FuelBand SE BLE Protocol Reversed
by cordite on Friday January 30, 2015 @11:14AM
(#8972690)
In other words, obsfuscation was used instead of just applying good practice, and good practice is seemingly harder to debug for development than obsfuscation.
Re:Nike+ FuelBand SE BLE Protocol Reversed
by evilsocket on Friday January 30, 2015 @11:16AM
(#8972703)
EXACTLY :D