Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation

Re:Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation by Zigurd on Thursday January 29, 2015 @06:46PM (#8969631)

I never mentioned Matadano. I specifically refered to the "larger transnational security company" that acquired Matasano. If that's not correct regarding Matasano, I'm sorry. But I'm not being evasive in any way.

I'll let you know when I scale up to where I get a glimpse into the abyss.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation by m0nastic on Thursday January 29, 2015 @07:20PM (#8969776)

I ran the professional services division for one of the largest companies in the same space as Matasano.

I'd love to hear what you think the NSA might have persuaded us to do?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation by tptacek on Thursday January 29, 2015 @10:01PM (#8970254)

I worked for the "multinational" for two years after the acquisition and I'm curious about NSA's evil influence too. Tell us more, Zigurd? Seriously: just a theory about what could have been happening would be great.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation by Zigurd on Thursday January 29, 2015 @10:31PM (#8970332)

Since your indignation is fully intact, "one of the largest companies..." would not be RSA, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says it fought gag orders in WikiLeaks investigation by m0nastic on Thursday January 29, 2015 @10:48PM (#8970369)

RSA isn't in remotely the same space as Matasano, nor would it be "one of the largest" if it were in that space.

As I rock back and forth in my chair, silently repeat the serenity prayer, and try to remain charitable; what sort of work do you think Matasano (or NCC, Accuvant, or VerizonBusiness, my former employer) does?

[ Parent | on HN ]