Re:Source Code Similarities Between NSA Malware and 'Regin' ...
by PeterisP on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @10:57AM
(#8953690)
"Trusted computing" puts the controller of the trusted infrastructure in control - the owner of the computer should expect that any NSA-approved malware will be considered properly trusted, and being in control of a secure OS doesn't help against attacks coming from the hardware (malware or backdoors on firmware) with direct memory access.
Re:Source Code Similarities Between NSA Malware and 'Regin' ...
by atmosx on Tuesday January 27, 2015 @12:54PM
(#8954536)
I LOVE how you come with trusted computing on a topic about a malware allegedly created/modified by the NSA.
You MUST be a security professional! Only those have such a distorted view of reality!!!!
The only similar thing I've heard of is the "Secure Attention Sequence" in Windows. That is, pressing CtrlAltDel before entering credentials lets you be sure an application is not mimicking the logon prompt. But of course if the OS is compromised (like by loading a driver that intercepts such keystrokes, like VMware Enhanced Keyboard) all bets are off.
Think about it, the OS is executing all the code for the app, and storing all the memory.
This is also why there is a push for trusted computing. Being able to have your processor, OS, etc be able to verify they are running a trusted configuration is a powerful thing. It makes the owner of the computer in control. (The downside is when the user is not the owner, but would like to be, then they get upset at restrictions.)