News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by Animats on Thursday January 22, 2015 @12:27AM (#8927696)
I used one of those as an undergrad. It was really a programmable calculator. It was incredibly slow for an all-electronic device; square roots took seconds. You could write simple programs for it and get homework done, though.

It was beautiful. Olivetti had great industrial design in the 1960s and 1970s. Their typewriters and calculators were works of art, and you can often find them today in the collections of major modern art museums. Olivetti tried to get into computers, and even had a good-looking IBM PC clone. The nice design didn't help.

The Mathatron came out a year earlier, in 1963. (http://www.oldcalculatormuseum.com/math8-48mII.html) Unlike the Programma 101, the Mathatron had trig functions built-in. The Mathatron had enough compute power that they offered a remote-access shared programmable calculator with a phone modem. (http://www.amazon.com/Wright-Mathatron-Computer-Calculator-M...)

The shared-calculator approach reached its peak with the Control Data Remote Calculator. (http://www.oldcalculatormuseum.com/a-cdc-11-65.html) This was a scheme to have 2000 calculators share a CDC 6600 mainframe computer, an excellent supercomputer of the 1960s. It was not successful, and surplus units appeared in the movies Soylent Green, Westworld, and Marooned.

None of these were very powerful, but the alternative at the time was slide rules and trig tables.

Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by Someone on Thursday January 22, 2015 @05:33AM (#8928448)
"It was incredibly slow for an all-electronic device"

It wasn't all-electronic; that memory used _sound_waves_ to store bits. That six meters of wire probably meant that reading a word, worst-case, took about a ms (assuming a fairly generous sound speed of 6km/s), and about every instruction read from and wrote to that storage. This being the first of its kind, the implementation probably would be worst-case for both reading and writing (wait for the 'start of memory' marker, count bits until the ones needed come along)

And of course, it had to read its instructions from the same wire. I guess 500 instructions per second would be an exaggeration of its performance.

Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by Someone on Thursday January 22, 2015 @08:17AM (#8928960)
I started wondering how one would reliably store a bit in about a microsecond of audio in the 1960s in a device that doesn't require continuous tuning.

Google led me to http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay_line_memory#Magnetostri.... It isn't audio, but a torsional wave, and Wikipedia claims a delay in the order of half a millisecond.

Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by Camillo on Thursday January 22, 2015 @03:12AM (#8928081)
The key difference is that the Mathatron was not reprogrammable, according to that link. It would come preprogrammed with some programs in ROM, and that was it.
Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by rjsw on Thursday January 22, 2015 @08:33AM (#8929013)
>Olivetti tried to get into computers, and even had a good-looking IBM PC clone. The nice design didn't help.

The M24 [1] worked well too. It had a good display, particularly with the black and white monitor. An OEM Logitech mouse could be plugged into the keyboard.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivetti_M24

Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by jzwinck on Thursday January 22, 2015 @12:50AM (#8927769)
I agree about Olivetti's designs. I could tell they were something special even as a child, and wrote a bit about it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8860920
Re:Olivetti Programma 101 “Perottina” by agumonkey on Thursday January 22, 2015 @04:44AM (#8928341)
Olivetti seems like an Apple of the day. They had a nice blend of engineering and design, all for the purpose of making the desktop enjoyable and productive.

I recently found this blog entry showing a lot of beautiful ideas http://ceciliapolidoritwicedesign2.blogspot.fr/2011/12/sotts...