News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by bhaumik on Monday January 19, 2015 @10:42PM (#8915375)
>>Perma.cc promises “to create citation links that will never break.” It works something like the Wayback Machine’s “Save Page Now.” If you’re writing a scholarly paper and want to use a link in your footnotes, you can create an archived version of the page you’re linking to, a “permalink,” and anyone later reading your footnotes will, when clicking on that link, be brought to the permanently archived version. Perma.cc has already been adopted by law reviews and state courts; it’s only a matter of time before it’s universally adopted as the standard in legal, scientific, and scholarly citation.

Glad to see this exists and is being properly utilized.

Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by gfody on Monday January 19, 2015 @10:27PM (#8915329)
The Strelkov post mentioned in the article (translated to English) https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev...
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by userbinator on Monday January 19, 2015 @10:40PM (#8915368)
This essay is about two hundred thousand bytes.

In disbelief at the fact that I did not feel like I had read 200KB of text, I had to check and it was around an order of magnitude off. The page with the markup included is around half of that.

I suppose that in this era of GB and TB, people are going to overestimate a bit more.

Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by desp on Monday January 19, 2015 @11:31PM (#8915498)
Likely they were writing the essay in a desktop editor and are referring to the size of the file on disk (potentially including references, revision data, etc). In plaintext the essay seems to be ~36kb.
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by mmahemoff on Monday January 19, 2015 @08:07PM (#8914965)
Ironic that this article's publication date is 6 days from now.

"Annals of Technology JANUARY 26, 2015 ISSUE"

Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by jedberg on Monday January 19, 2015 @08:25PM (#8915004)
Think of the date on a written publication not as the publication date, but a version number. This is the "January 26, 2015" version. The version number just happens to look like a date, but it isn't. Much like Windows 95. :)
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday by declan on Monday January 19, 2015 @09:21PM (#8915150)
It's a print-world legacy style. It is, to a first approximation, when that issue of the New Yorker will be replaced on the newsstands by the next one.