Re:What the Web Said Yesterday
by bhaumik on Monday January 19, 2015 @10:42PM
(#8915375)
>>Perma.cc promises “to create citation links that will never break.” It works something like the Wayback Machine’s “Save Page Now.” If you’re writing a scholarly paper and want to use a link in your footnotes, you can create an archived version of the page you’re linking to, a “permalink,” and anyone later reading your footnotes will, when clicking on that link, be brought to the permanently archived version. Perma.cc has already been adopted by law reviews and state courts; it’s only a matter of time before it’s universally adopted as the standard in legal, scientific, and scholarly citation.
Glad to see this exists and is being properly utilized.
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday
by userbinator on Monday January 19, 2015 @10:40PM
(#8915368)
This essay is about two hundred thousand bytes.
In disbelief at the fact that I did not feel like I had read 200KB of text, I had to check and it was around an order of magnitude off. The page with the markup included is around half of that.
I suppose that in this era of GB and TB, people are going to overestimate a bit more.
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday
by desp on Monday January 19, 2015 @11:31PM
(#8915498)
Likely they were writing the essay in a desktop editor and are referring to the size of the file on disk (potentially including references, revision data, etc). In plaintext the essay seems to be ~36kb.
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday
by jedberg on Monday January 19, 2015 @08:25PM
(#8915004)
Think of the date on a written publication not as the publication date, but a version number. This is the "January 26, 2015" version. The version number just happens to look like a date, but it isn't. Much like Windows 95. :)
Re:What the Web Said Yesterday
by declan on Monday January 19, 2015 @09:21PM
(#8915150)
It's a print-world legacy style. It is, to a first approximation, when that issue of the New Yorker will be replaced on the newsstands by the next one.
Glad to see this exists and is being properly utilized.
In disbelief at the fact that I did not feel like I had read 200KB of text, I had to check and it was around an order of magnitude off. The page with the markup included is around half of that.
I suppose that in this era of GB and TB, people are going to overestimate a bit more.
"Annals of Technology JANUARY 26, 2015 ISSUE"