News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by fargolime on Friday January 16, 2015 @01:17PM (#8900533)
I'm guessing one stays put and the other does a grid pattern search.
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by ksrm on Friday January 16, 2015 @03:11PM (#8901352)
How does each robot decide whether to stay put or not if it can't communicate with the other?
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by fargolime on Friday January 16, 2015 @09:12PM (#8903053)
Ha, good point. Could be pre-arranged. But if something can be pre-arranged, I like mikeash's answer.
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by kaybe on Friday January 16, 2015 @01:34PM (#8900668)
Most of them have means to leave marks on the ground. Would that count as communicating for that exercise?
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by IvyMike on Friday January 16, 2015 @03:01PM (#8901297)
That might work on the moon, but on Mars... http://www.universetoday.com/14892/mars-dust-storms/
Re:Lost Beagle2 probe found 'intact' on Mars by kaybe on Friday January 16, 2015 @04:58PM (#8902002)
>> Because the planet’s atmosphere is only about 1% as dense as Earth’s only the smallest dust grains hang in the air.

It should be possible to move a few larger rocks, maybe? Spirit, Opportunity and Curiosity have robotic arms. Good image processing might or might not recognize patterns in the stones.

(http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/mars/vikinglander... for an example what most images I saw look like. I imagine it looks like this after a storm: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/mars/vikinglander...)

(Of course, compared to mikeash's answer, this is overengineering and only applicable if their conditions are not met (prearranged meeting point; we have a map and know our location))