Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by colordrops on Thursday January 15, 2015 @11:27PM
(#8897258)
No one would believe the author of the insecure PHP spaghetti code behind Mt. Gox is the same as painstakingly careful designer of bitcoin.
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by mculp on Thursday January 15, 2015 @11:52PM
(#8897315)
Just wanted to point out that Silk Road is also PHP spaghetti.
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by AlyssaRowan on Friday January 16, 2015 @03:57AM
(#8897823)
Indeed. I feel quite confident saying that Satoshi Nakamoto is not Mark Karpeles. <g>
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by eru on Thursday January 15, 2015 @11:53PM
(#8897317)
Perfect alibi? </sarcasm>
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by helium on Friday January 16, 2015 @10:02AM
(#8899255)
You would have to suffer from multiple personality disorder to pull that off, I'm sure :)
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by Joona on Friday January 16, 2015 @02:22AM
(#8897609)
When you can write great code, you can also write spaghetti?
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by dwd on Thursday January 15, 2015 @10:41PM
(#8897139)
Substitute Keyser Soze for Satoshi Nakamoto in every article you have ever read about him and you have a movie script.
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by mey on Thursday January 15, 2015 @08:56PM
(#8896835)
The entity of DPR put out a hit. Proving out who/whom is DPR is part of the important consideration of charges.
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by paulrosenzweig on Thursday January 15, 2015 @09:36PM
(#8896967)
He's not being charged with that, but the jury is seeing the evidence.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/judge-govt-can-sh...
Re:Defense in Silk Road Trial Says Mt. Gox CEO Was the Real ...
by NoMoreNicksLeft on Friday January 16, 2015 @10:29AM
(#8899441)
Keep in mind they also claim he was conspiring to murder, but haven't bothered to charge him with that.
The likely explanation here is that they exaggerate everything to some insane degree for exciting press conferences (and to subtly poison potential jurors).
So my limited understanding here and what this case is actually about is that it is not so much trying to prove that Ulbricht had anything to do with the site (because the association was proven), but rather who actually was the mastermind behind the site (and pocketing large sums of cash from transactions). Seems association with such a site would carry a lesser charge than being the one who was profiting off of the marketplace and behind its original conception (this is my limited understanding and it could be wrong).
This story is absolutely insane, it will be interesting to see where this case heads. From what I gather, the bust in the library, screenshots of the chat and admin panel of the site and supposedly a few scrunched up pieces of paper found in the bin of Ulbrichts home are all they have (that we know about). There is nothing that actually proves or disproves that either Ulbricht or Karpeles, are the owners of Silk Road.
Now we just need the defence to come out and claim that Karpeles is actually Satoshi Nakamoto and then we've got ourselves a super interesting case. There is undoubtedly a movie script in here somewhere once the case is finished.