News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DigitalOcean now supports FreeBSD by crest on Thursday January 15, 2015 @12:11PM (#8893718)
On UFS soft-updates have a lower overhead than soft-updates with metadata journaling. The downside of soft-updates without journaling is that it requires a background fsck to recover leaked space after unclean shutdowns. I prefer UFS2 SU (not SU+J) on FreeBSD for small systems, because SU+J is incompatible with UFS snapshots.

There are no comments on this comment yet.