News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by tomohawk on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @08:14AM (#8885986)
And the problem with police not having guns is amply demonstrated by the recent terror in France. The first police to respond were unarmed.
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by ceejayoz on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @08:41AM (#8886119)
That doesn't appear to be true.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/08/ahmed-merabet-m...

> Merabet, who according to officials was 40, was called to the scene while on patrol with a female colleague in the neighbourhood, just in time to see the black Citroën used by the two killers heading towards the boulevard from Charlie Hebdo.

> “He was on foot, and came nose to nose with the terrorists. He pulled out his weapon. It was his job, it was his duty,” said Rocco Contento, a colleague who was a union representative at the central police station for Paris’s 11th arrondissement.

> Another policeman, 48-year-old Franck Brinsolaro, was killed moments earlier in the assault on Charlie Hebdo where he was responsible for the protection of its editor, Stéphane Charbonnier, one of the 11 killed in the building. A colleague said he “never had time” to pull his weapon.

See also the NYPD cops killed recently - definitely armed - who were shot regardless.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by tomohawk on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @09:35AM (#8886444)
I was going off of reports such as this:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-hebdo-french-satirical-m...

"the first two officers to arrive, who were apparently unarmed, fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher."

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by Someone1234 on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @10:07AM (#8886639)
CBS News isn't a reliable source.

This is also the same "source" which claimed that both suspects had been captured and a third killed according to "US intelligence sources" (still unnamed). Turned out that that wasn't true at that point in time or since then.

They're like the Daily Mail of the US, just peddle utter shit all of the time...

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by halfcat on Thursday January 15, 2015 @12:33AM (#8891077)
>CBS News isn't a reliable source.

This tells me nothing. Are the facts presented by parent's post false or not?

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by antimagic on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @09:14AM (#8886318)
Yup, French police carry sidearms... And if that's not enough, during periods of elevated risk of a terrorist attack, you even get soldiers walking around with semi-automatic rifles in squads of three.
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by exprL on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @10:01AM (#8886601)
This interests me (in a slightly off-topic way): do the soldiers really switch their service weapons to a semi-automatic model in order to patrol, or are all the rifles within the military police (etc.) semi-automatic only?
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by base2 on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @08:07PM (#8890298)
Most military rifles are semi-automatic. Even with a fairly tame AR style rifle using automatic fire makes it a little harder to quickly engage targets and the recoil can be a little un-predictable even when just using burst fire.

In short most military rifles are single shot due to the fact that you may engage targets out to a few hundred yard to a couple of meters.

tldr; Automatic rifles for military applications, not all that great.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by antimagic on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @12:21PM (#8887618)
It's not military police, it's just plain ol' soldiers. Which kinda freaks me out, because I spend my time wondering exactly what their rules of engagement are, and how well they have been trained in them. At least they always have the safety engaged when I check...
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by base2 on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @08:15PM (#8890338)
Solders for the most part get much more time and training using firearms than police who tend to have a much wider range of duties to perform.

Most NATO militaries have increased the amount of training in urban environments. I'm pretty sure(or overly optimistic) they have decent training/drilling experience as the political backlash from having soldiers get way to aggressive in terms of resorting to military tactics vs police tactics.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by antimagic on Thursday January 15, 2015 @04:34AM (#8891641)
They are much better marksmen, it's true. But police have waaaaaay more experience dealing with drunk idiots, mentally ill people, people doped up to their eyeballs on speed and so on. Deciding whether someone is one of these or a serious security threat is not as easy as it might sound, hence my curiousity vis-a-vis the rules of engagement...

The Australian military is generally lauded as being excellent at peace-keeping operations, yet during officer training, it was hammered into us that policing was a much harder operation, and that our hierarchy would never accept policing missions.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by bmelton on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @12:01PM (#8887461)
I suspect that you're mistaken on what semi-automatic means. Basically all of the rifles likely to be carried by law enforcement are semi-automatic, except for sharp-shooters, who my carry a single-shot with a floated barrel.

Semi-automatic is not automatic, and has no burst or rapid-fire mechanisms. All semi-automatic rifles shoot one bullet for each pull of the trigger, and in 2015, that's the norm for just about every patrol rifle in the world, except for those needing long-range accuracy, which is a fairly niche application nowadays.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by exprL on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @06:04PM (#8889766)
The comment I responded to said that in addition to law enforcement, it's common for soldiers to patrol the streets, too, at times.

If I had to guess, I'd say they would prefer using the weapons they are accustomed to, which are probably not the same that LEO's use. Now I don't know much about the French military, but where I come from, I doubt the military even has appreciable amounts of semi-automatic rifles, as even the military police always use the same assault rifle everybody else does.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by antimagic on Thursday January 15, 2015 @10:03AM (#8892775)
Just for clarification's sake, the rifles in question carried by the French army are almost certainly automatic-capable, but like most military organisations around the world, I would expect them to be configured in semi-automatic mode, as you will run through a full clip of ammunition in two short bursts if you're in automatic mode, and that will mostly be a waste of ammunition, unless you find yourself confronted with a massed charge. It would be difficult to believe that they weren't configured in semi-automatic mode in a friendly-territory urban setting!
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by bmelton on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @06:38PM (#8889940)
Ah, my apologies. I read the comment backwards from what it was, so thanks for the clarification.

That said, I have no idea what the French Miliary use. I would guess a lot of H&K stuff. In the U.S. at least, swapping out from an M16 to an AR-15 is pretty natural, but I have no way of knowing what the transition is from or to in France.

Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by dagw on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @08:27AM (#8886049)
What difference to you think it would have made if they had been armed?
Re:The Human Toll of Flashbangs by bmelton on Wednesday January 14, 2015 @12:02PM (#8887467)
In this case, since the OP is incorrect, and they were armed, absolutely nothing.