News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introduction to Clojure by jacquesm on Saturday October 17, 2009 @10:51AM (#886983)
which suggests the use of a 'close all open parens' token to cut down on all the )))))) stuff at the end of a line, which can get really tedious, especially when editing in 'dumb' editors.
Re:Introduction to Clojure by dreish on Saturday October 17, 2009 @10:56AM (#886986)
That's not much help when you want to close all but one or two.

The solution is to use the right tool for the job. Emacs has something called paredit-mode that relieves you of having to type the closing parens.

Re:Introduction to Clojure by gruseom on Saturday October 17, 2009 @11:35AM (#887038)
paredit-mode

Yes! I can't do without it now. BTW somebody told me Paredit is a port of the old Interlisp structured editor.

There's also http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=877386, if you haven't seen it.

Re:Introduction to Clojure by dreish on Saturday October 17, 2009 @12:19PM (#887094)
I'm glad I took the plunge, too. At first, it seemed like a really bad idea -- far too awkward and unfamiliar for the minor advantage of automatically inserting closing parens. I kept at it mainly out of an attraction to the novel and quirky for long enough to discover that its biggest advantages aren't from not having to type ")" -- they're for things like barf, slurp, splice, and the S-expression-aware kill-line.

Whenever I'm programming in a non-Lisp language, I really miss those kinds of editor features that are enabled by having an idiot-simple syntax.

Re:Introduction to Clojure by jacquesm on Saturday October 17, 2009 @11:07AM (#886999)
Someone should make a really good course to 'bridge' from being an experienced PHP, Perl, Java or Python programmer to that same level of competence using Clojure.
Re:Introduction to Clojure by rw on Saturday October 17, 2009 @04:03PM (#887350)
From my experience, the syntactic gap is wider than the semantic one. I suggest first, perhaps, translating Python into faux S-exprs (should be easy, given the indentation style). From there one might emphasize declarative vs. imperative, and functional as a subset of the former.