Re:A Career in Science Will Cost You Your Firstborn
by dekhn on Friday January 09, 2015 @05:09PM
(#8864814)
US pharma hires few if any organic chemists any more. That work got offshored a decade ago.
Re:A Career in Science Will Cost You Your Firstborn
by refurb on Friday January 09, 2015 @05:36PM
(#8864933)
This is true. It's not only outsourcing, but also the shift from small molecules to large molecules (proteins, antibodies). Pharma companies have shed thousands of chemists over the past 10 years. I know a few who have been able to hold onto their jobs, but it hasn't been pretty.
Re:A Career in Science Will Cost You Your Firstborn
by refurb on Friday January 09, 2015 @08:07PM
(#8865421)
Just to add more context, I used to work as a chemistry researcher and when I first started job hunting in the early 2000's pharma was desperate for organic chemists. You could apply to 5 openings and get 5 offers.
Most of the folks I knew who were chemists have moved onto other roles/industries.
Re:A Career in Science Will Cost You Your Firstborn
by DaveWalk on Saturday January 10, 2015 @11:52PM
(#8869068)
This is a HUGE point. It was once thought that being a chemistry PhD was a shoe-in for industry work, and you could skip being a postdoc entirely.
I met a very respected chemist at AACR last year who said all of his postdocs were scrambling for work, and that some were being realistic and considering moving to China for the opportunities.
Re:A Career in Science Will Cost You Your Firstborn
by IndianAstronaut on Friday January 09, 2015 @07:45PM
(#8865360)
I know lots of biochem phds from my grad program. The median jncome is around $50k. Many had to apply to hundreds of places to land a job.
I don't know the specific pay in these fields, but it is definitely higher than you would get staying in academics.