Re:Twitter’s new R package for anomaly detection
by Hansi on Thursday January 08, 2015 @07:48AM
(#8856136)
I wouldn't call it blogspam since r-bloggers.com is an opt-in aggregator. But yes a link to the original makes more sense.
Re:Twitter’s new R package for anomaly detection
by Dzidas on Thursday January 08, 2015 @09:22AM
(#8856442)
What's the point to credit middle man? Hacker news, reddit do the same (or even better), r-bloggers just rip off the content. Been there, done that.
Re:Twitter’s new R package for anomaly detection
by Hansi on Thursday January 08, 2015 @09:52AM
(#8856583)
That's not what I said, my point was that labelling it blogspam doesn't seem correct because it's opt-in and a preferred source for articles for many in the R community. And as I said the original link should have been linked to.
https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-practical-and-robu...
And the previous discussion is here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8846205