News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by smilliken on Friday January 02, 2015 @08:26PM (#8829554)
> "well known data base [sic] degradation"

Came in here to refute this as well. We've been running PostgreSQL on ZFS (ZoL) at MixRank, and it's been holding up very well. We switched from EXT primarily for compression which gives us ~2x savings on IO throughput.

Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by twic on Friday January 02, 2015 @08:51PM (#8829609)
Is there any particular PostgreSQL or ZFS configuration that is necessary?

I vaguely remember something about turning off the ZIL for the data files, because the WAL provides the integrity. Or the other way round. Or something else.