Or are you implying that the developers of digital technology did so merely to copy cheaply those things which were previously hard and lossy to copy? (I doubt it.)
I.e. what is your actual criticism of my argument?
That isn't what's happening. Your analogy was criticized, and now instead of taking it as an opportunity to refine your point and move the ball forward on a worthwhile conversation, you're digging in and demanding everyone just agree with you because you spoke up.
I even agreed with you on the merit and overall point of your post, but pointed out that calling people willfully distributing content to others who don't have to pay for it isn't a "freak storm". It's deliberate action.
I stated your analogy mischaracterizes an act of nature with willful and deliberate actions of people copying and redistributing content but agreed that markets need to evolve their distribution channels. I don't owe you anything more than that.
Have a nice day.
That said: I agree with the theme of consternation over outmoded content distribution methods, not adapting with changing demand in the market place is a good way to becoming outmoded yourself.