News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.

Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by gaius on Saturday December 20, 2014 @06:21AM (#8776380)
This is some quality work. The Java results are particularly striking! It would be interesting to see some more languages that have more than one implementation compared.

What is the difference between FSharp and F#?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by logicchains on Saturday December 20, 2014 @07:12AM (#8776455)
FSharp instead of F# is just a way of getting around issues with using the # character in the shell scripts that run the benchmark.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by gaius on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:07AM (#8776544)
But he says F#, Haskell, Rust and Dart send their apologies. F# didn't have an Arch Linux package for ARM, and when I built it myself the compiler and runtime segfaulted upon use
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ARMv7 vs. x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Ni... by logicchains on Saturday December 20, 2014 @08:18AM (#8776561)
Wow, you're right, no idea where that FSharp entry on the ARM results is coming from.
[ Parent | on HN ]