"Opportunities to get backing for war are rare, and so there is good reason to think that the government would try to capitalize on them."..."USS Maine, anyone?"..."Queue an invasion of North Korea."
Literally quite literally doesn't mean what you apparently think it means.
And the general conspiratorial narrative is that the US is trying to blame a blameless North Korea to achieve...something. Not sure what.
"And the general conspiratorial narrative is that the US is trying to blame a blameless North Korea to achieve...something. Not sure what."
To assume the US Government's PR team won't use anything/everything to reinforce, reiterate or bolster it's own agenda is just idiocy. There are far too many examples throughout history where it has.
Whether or not that means that this investigation is a farce, is another question.
My hangup here is that the DPRK historically provides absolutely no shortage of excuses for the US to grandstand, but with the occasional exception of them shelling some South Korean island or kidnappings a tourist, they are usually (publically) ignored. Niche news websites about North Korea will talk about the crap they do or say weekly, but you usually only see US government officials and mainsteam US media piping up once or twice a year.
Its not like the US has to manufacturer an excuse to complain about them. There is an abundance of genuine North Korean antics to choose from if they want to.
cite a single comment where somebody has said "they are making this up to go to war"
Re:Update on Sony Investigation
by RobertKerans on Friday December 19, 2014 @02:01PM
(#8773835)
The parent you replied to quoted three.
This thread is filled with them, but here is one:
literally nobody has said that, all that most people have said is that if you're going to accuse another nation of an act of "cyberwar" at least provide proof. Is that too much to ask?