> I don't know if a 60 hour work week counts as exploitation. If you options are 400$/month and 40 hour weeks or 600$ a month and 60 hour weeks a lot of people are going to chose the second option.
And that is why it is exploitation: They are in a position where they don't realistically have a choice, and hence don't realistically have power to negotiate higher salaries for more reasonable hours.
This is the basis for e.g. EU working time regulations that makes 60 hour work weeks illegal within the EU with few exceptions.
Re:Apple goes to war with the BBC
by lucaspiller on Friday December 19, 2014 @09:51AM
(#8772414)
Bear in mind that the salary these workers get is probably less than half that. Last year, according to the Daily Mail (yeah...), they were being paid £180 ($300) per month [0]. The salary these workers get is a small percentage of the retail price of these devices, it's not like Apple can't afford to pay them a decent salary and provide ethical working conditions.
[0] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2103798/Revealed-Ins...
> it's not like Apple can't afford to pay them a decent salary
Well, Apple doesn't pay them any salary at all—they're not Apple employees.
Re:Apple goes to war with the BBC
by ghostDancer on Friday December 19, 2014 @01:48PM
(#8773756)
Yes but they are deeply offended , if they're not their employees is not their problem, why feel offended? .
Also, dorm style housing next to a factory dramatically cut down on commute times which changes the work life balance equation. It's much like a 50 hour work week with a 1 hour commute which is fairly common in the US.
PS: IMO the US trucking industry is probably more expletive than most Chinese factory's. The hours are often comparable but the risk of death is much higher. And the industry often increases peoples risk of death for just a little more profit.