News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Poll: Is self-posting ok? by 10ren on Monday October 12, 2009 @12:05AM (#875962)
I think there's some ambiguity about whether you mean submitting your own blog entry, or making a submission that consists of text rather than a link.

Literally, a "self-post" is the latter, and I see in one of your replies that that's what you meant. However, commentors have interpreted it both ways (and I thought you meant the former).

Perhaps you could clarify in the poll - though there are already 252+7 votes with the original text, so maybe a new poll is appropriate?

As for the poll: I think submitting a blog (the former) is definitely OK; but I don't have a clear conception on a "self-post" (the latter). It could lead to HN being a kind of mini-blogging service (blog > HN > tweet). Maybe that would be cool, but it's very different from what it is now; and it's too unknown for me to form a clear opinion, without some experience of it. Therefore, because I think you mean the latter, I can't vote!

However, someone commented that pg deliberately made the text of a self-post in a lighter grey, to discourage it... so he seems against it.

Re:Poll: Is self-posting ok? by alttab on Monday October 12, 2009 @12:18AM (#875987)
I caught on to the subtly of the lighter text as well.

I could kind of tell because when a Ask HN comes up with 3 paragraphs of text and its in that light color, the conversion rate form me actually reading it drops significantly.

Re:Poll: Is self-posting ok? by ErrantX on Monday October 12, 2009 @03:32AM (#876252)
I have first hand experience of that; and your right.
Re:Poll: Is self-posting ok? by j_baker on Monday October 12, 2009 @07:41AM (#876508)
Yeah, it's been so long that I've heard "self-posting" used to mean the latter that I had forgotten about it. Isn't that a redit thing?
Re:Poll: Is self-posting ok? by 10ren on Monday October 12, 2009 @09:15PM (#878051)
So... which one did you mean?

Your other reply * seemed to indicate the latter (as I say in the comment); but here you're saying that you'd forgotten about that meaning, so I guess you can't have meant it...

* http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=875735 ah, now I see: the commenter gave two interpretations, and you replied "that's what I meant" without specifying which one. I didn't notice the ambiguity, and read you as meaning the "grey text in a HN post"; but it now seems you meant the other meaning ("linking to your own blog"). Wow. Confusion upon confusion, which I didn't notice even when asking about it. :-?