Re:Show HN: Comments by Top HN Posters Analysed by IBM's Wat...
by kolinko on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:34PM
(#8747452)
> I almost feel like these results require a lot of interpretation, and that interpretation is about as reliable as a horoscope.
I got a similar feeling from this - that's why I'd love to see some hard data behind the algorithm, or at least bits and pieces about the methodology used to arrive upon it.
So for all purposes that you, I or Watson can demonstrate, "do you think X is Y" and "do you think X's comments show Y" are functionally the same.
edit
I just checked what Watson thinks are my needs. Apparently I don't have many, and everybody on HN has an extreme need for Challenge.
I almost feel like these results require a lot of interpretation, and that interpretation is about as reliable as a horoscope.