Re:Top physics breakthroughs of 2014
by delinka on Friday December 12, 2014 @06:41PM
(#8743371)
Right. So I see this comment mentioning tractor beam, I get my hopes up, and read "acoustic" in the article and come back here to express mild disappointment. Does the fact that I omitted that detail somehow mean I misunderstood?
0. = "Definitely not in a vacuum"