Re:Top physics breakthroughs of 2014
by delinka on Friday December 12, 2014 @02:17PM
(#8742094)
Definitely awesome, but I was so hoping for "...in a vacuum" with that one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It already said "Acoustic"[0] ;)
0. = "Definitely not in a vacuum"
Right. So I see this comment mentioning tractor beam, I get my hopes up, and read "acoustic" in the article and come back here to express mild disappointment. Does the fact that I omitted that detail somehow mean I misunderstood?