Re:The bad side of systemd: two recent systemd failures
by adestefan on Friday December 12, 2014 @11:58AM
(#8741178)
Which was the result of Ubuntu shipping buggy beta builds when everyone told them not to do it. So blame Ubuntu and not PulseAudio.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The bad side of systemd: two recent systemd failures
by Wilya on Friday December 12, 2014 @12:25PM
(#8741383)
My biggest problems were on Fedora, but it's not been really easy on Archlinux and Gentoo either...
Re:The bad side of systemd: two recent systemd failures
by nieve on Saturday December 13, 2014 @02:36AM
(#8744535)
It was a nightmare for me and several other local users on SuSE/openSUSE as well, so I think we're down to just Debian and Mandriva as major distros of that period that might not have had serious issues (Slackware was very conservative about integrating it). I suspect @adestefan used other distros minimally if at all and got lucky as far as PulseAudio went and I'm a bit envious. Problems with PA were a frequent topic in our LUG for 3-4 years and only a fraction of that was distro devs testing it early. Really they should have just used "PulseAudio: More powerful than OSS and more stable than Flash!" as the slogan.