I speak seven languages. It's easy to see why English got so popular so fast. It is an extremely simple language compared to others and even though it is ambiguous in certain cases, most languages have ambiguity here and there.

Talented English speakers can at least get rid of most ambiguity by themselves, which is something a lot of other languages don't have.

My actual favourite language so far is Swedish. Is it much more raw than English, has less overall ambiguity and has a beautiful ring to it. It is also very easy for a skilled English speaker to pick up and I would recommend it if you are interested in languages. (It also gives you German for free)

Yep I agree, I love the Swedish language too. It is so much simpler than German actually, and I experience the Swedes being capable of a "simple" way of thinking (in a good sense) that I never witness with Germans.

>(It also gives you German for free)

That's like saying that learning English gives you French for free. It really helps, but it hardly gives you the entire language for free, just a significant chunk of it.

English does not even sort of give you French for free. It does give you Spanish (and Italian, to an extent) for free though. And I speak of all this from experience.

Oops, I meant French gives you Spanish for free, of course.

I've found the French I studied to have more consistent grammar and spelling, and less variation in idioms. Its achilles heel for technical stuff seems to be vocabulary, in that new nouns and verbs don't get created, and the Canadian and French maintainers seem averse to loanwords.

I too have gotten used to firing up the developer tools and removing position:fixed. The second-most common thing I have to do is set restricted column widths. I get linked to pages that use a print stylesheet, a lot of the time, and just as I restrict the line length in my text editor, I don't want to deal with that in the browser.

I've not experienced it personally, but I'm told that French grammar gets pretty gnarly after you get past the simpler stuff.

I'm told that Italian, for example, has such a regularity that pretty much every word is spelled phonetically, so guessing the spelling always works.

In my limited experience, this is mostly true of Spanish, and nearly for Polish as well (although the latter has a few sneaky digraphs and some regular exceptions).

I'm also told that this is true of German.

> I'm also told that this is true of German.

Not quite. We have a bunch of French loanwords that are confusing to spell, some sounds that blend into each other (eu/äu, e/ä, ch/g), we pronounce a 'd' like a 't' at the ent of a wort (so Germans are perpetually confused if it's spelled Standard or Standart), and our markers for whether a vowel is long or short are pretty inconsistent.

All of the Romance languages are well structured, in stark contrast to English. There is no "GHOTI = FISH" nonsense in them.

Spoken ambiguity and written ambiguity are two very different things and English should not be judged on the merits of the British-English accent.

(You speak of the structure of Romance languages...)

Korean is much better, mostly because the written language was created much later than most so the spelling is all phonetic.

Many natural languages have more reasonable spelling than English. Part of the problem with English is that the language takes a large amount of vocabulary and root words from different language groups.