News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by jerf on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @02:55PM (#8689421)
If you're sending humans, that's another month or two of the most expensive supplies in the history of human endeavor. It's not exactly a detail that we can currently afford to wave away.

(And I do mean afford. If we had better propulsion tech, like, oh, say, anything nuclear, we wouldn't have to worry so much about such details. But if we're going to hobble ourselves by rejecting that out of hand, we can't afford much mass.)

Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by baq on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @03:11PM (#8689521)
And nuclear thermal isn't even that good at 'only' (should I say surprisingly?) about 2x ISP, so you'd still need lots of mass.