Slack's New Arbitration Policy

Re:Slack's New Arbitration Policy by function_seven on Monday November 24, 2014 @03:19PM (#8654512)

I may be a bit dense, but your comment doesn't seem to relate to the article I just read. Is this the wrong thread or am I missing something?

EDIT: I have to be missing something. Half the comments here talk about arbitration, but that word doesn't appear once in the blog post. Was it edited?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Slack's New Arbitration Policy by mbreese on Monday November 24, 2014 @03:31PM (#8654576)

You're not missing anything. Two posts were merged. This is the Privacy policy blog post by Slack. There was another blog post (third-party) that talked about changes in their TOS to include arbitration.

https://konklone.com/post/slack-is-now-forcing-users-into-ar...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Slack's New Arbitration Policy by thetrumanshow on Monday November 24, 2014 @03:26PM (#8654557)

Yes. If you Google "slack ycombinator", you'll see the original title in the results (as of 12:26 PST). Edit: also, as another commenter said, it was merged.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Slack's New Arbitration Policy by slig on Monday November 24, 2014 @03:26PM (#8654551)

Looks like another thread was merged here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Slack's New Arbitration Policy by etjossem on Monday November 24, 2014 @03:22PM (#8654530)

The changes to the Terms of Service (linked from the blog post) include a new binding arbitration clause.

[ Parent | on HN ]