Re:FreeBSD: the next 10 years
by FeeTinesAMady on Saturday November 22, 2014 @10:53PM
(#8647744)
Just because those are the stated reasons for developing systemd, that doesn't mean that those are the actual reasons, nor does it mean that other init systems don't work (even though they could be improved - into, say, OpenRC).
And that definitely doesn't imply that the poster was a troll. You didn't even address that. That is a personal attack, and is typical of how systemd supporters shout down the opposition.
> Here, try filling in the blanks: “[ ] is hard to do with SysV init. I don't like the way systemd does [ ] because [] and prefer the way [] does [] instead"
> See the difference?
So anyone who criticizes systemd and doesn't fill in those blanks is a troll?
Re:FreeBSD: the next 10 years
by the_solution on Monday November 24, 2014 @10:40AM
(#8652838)
The unresolved problems of SysV don't automatically make the systemd approach right either.
That was my point: there are well-known limitations to those systems which are the stated reasons for developing systemd in the first place. It's reasonable to disagree about the priorities or the approach which systemd uses but instead pekk instead just pretended that there aren't any unsolved problems.
> You're doing it right here: anyone who disagrees with you is a troll
Here, try filling in the blanks: “[ ] is hard to do with SysV init. I don't like the way systemd does [ ] because [] and prefer the way [] does [] instead"
See the difference?