News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by gadders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:00PM (#8631135)
OFFTOPIC: "Today, I want to share some recent learnings from performance tuning this new application stack."

The word you want is "lessons".

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by quarterto on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:07PM (#8631167)
"learnings" is a perfectly cromulent word: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=learnings&year...
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by mcguire on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:19PM (#8632026)
If you are Sacha Baron Cohen, yes.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by quarterto on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @03:59PM (#8632579)
Use of this word predates Sacha Baron Cohen's entire existence.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by gadders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:18PM (#8631245)
Nope. You see an option for a plural here? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/learning
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by M2Ys4U on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:40PM (#8631390)
Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They can only tell you if something is a word, not whether something isn't a word.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by gadders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:28PM (#8634086)
Well certainly there is no law against using made-up words. If that's what you want to do, have at it.

At least it will help people get their buzzword bingo cards filled up sooner.

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by not_kurt_godel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:10PM (#8631569)
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by from_elsewhere on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:28PM (#8631306)
Dictionaries ain't arbiters of the English language. And quite fortunately so, I should note.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by mikeryan on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:08PM (#8631171)
OFFTOPIC: "Today, I want to share some recent learnings from performance tuning this new application stack."

The word you want is "lessons".

Jeez, not only is your comment offtopic and pedantic, it's also wrong.

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by swasheck on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:09PM (#8631181)
"it's also wrong."

I believe the word you want is "incorrect."

/sarcasm

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by gadders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:13PM (#8631215)
I flagged it as Offtopic. But it is correct. "Learnings" is at best a pointless affectation, like saying "utilised" instead of "used". At worst, according to the OED, it's not even a word.

http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/19227/plural-of-l...

Also: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/learning No plural option.

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by chocolateboy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:18PM (#8632013)
> "Learnings" is at best a pointless affectation

No, at best it's a deliberately wonky usage for comic effect [1], like "Internets". It's quite possible the author is being gamesome. [2]

[1] https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borat:_Cultural_Learnings_...

[2] http://youtu.be/Wc1pxO_-5S8?t=6m43s

Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by Scramblejams on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:51PM (#8631458)
Continuing the OT and heedless of the downvotes: I appreciate your efforts, but they can't help themselves -- so many people love using recently invented (and redundant) words because they think it makes them sound smart and hip. Sorta like people who think JS is an amazing language and love to sell that point of view.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by gadders on Thursday November 20, 2014 @04:17AM (#8634928)
I think their must be a voting ring of marketers that are upset their latest buzzword-bingo entry has been called out :-)
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by cdelsolar on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:46PM (#8631425)
I play tournament Scrabble and learnings is a valid word in it.
Re:Node.js in Flame Graphs by jwhitlark on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:25PM (#8632061)
I didn't like it when people started using "learnings", but I'm beginning to appreciate some subtle shadings it seems to have over lessons. It seems more discovery oriented, and less sure it's correct, or at least, less widely correct. Sort of like "hacky, working hypotheses, that we think are worth sharing."