Re:Sorry, Lisp. I tried.
by hhm on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @10:32PM
(#86200)
No, I just was thinking in some Lisp implementation that didn't require to install the JVM, but that could use the bytecode of a lighter language, like Python. Also because I suppose if a Lisp implementation is generating code for a specific platform, its documentation will refer to such platform, and I'd prefer to read about Python bytecode than about JVM.
But maybe I'm wrong and it's just useless prejudice of my part.
But maybe I'm wrong and it's just useless prejudice of my part.