News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PostgreSQL vs. MS SQL. Parent comment

Re:PostgreSQL vs. MS SQL by rodgerd on Sunday November 16, 2014 @06:02PM (#8615880)
> I mean, seriously if you are going to put the time and effort into a long document like this, don't be so blatantly bias.

It's also totally counterproductive. If you tell me to use something and you start telling me things that aren't true I'm going to be deeply skeptical of your possibly-valid points if I know you're either ignorant or dishonest in some cases.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PostgreSQL vs. MS SQL by x0x0 on Sunday November 16, 2014 @06:23PM (#8615963)
this is, well, particularly apropos for keithwarren -- I had no end of pain getting csv into sql server; pg handles it fine
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PostgreSQL vs. MS SQL by keithwarren on Sunday November 16, 2014 @07:19PM (#8616140)
anecdotal but I have not had such issues, but being fair I have mostly not had to deal with non-english scenarios.

It is one thing to say 'SQL Server takes some effort to import CSV files with X scenarios'; but to say it does not import them at all?

[ Parent | on HN ]