News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Embracing HTTPS by dspillett on Friday November 14, 2014 @05:04AM (#8606469)
> The data is decrypted at Cloudflare, and retransmitted in the clear to the destination site. > The user thinks they have security, and they have a little, but less than they think.

That is true. But it the user's main concern is the legs of network from their location out of a local untrusted network (such as communal wireless) or country, that is definitely better than nothing.

> XP still has 19% market share

I don't worry about the security of XP+IE users any more. Anyone still there has chosen against good advice to remain insecure. It is their choice when there are other options available (both browsers that support modern standards on XP, and alternate OSs), it is their choice to have the certificate warning and more iffy security when they hit a site that needs SNI.

Re:Embracing HTTPS by tptacek on Friday November 14, 2014 @08:17AM (#8606946)
It's not about the security of XP users; it's about their connectivity.
Re:Embracing HTTPS by pixl97 on Friday November 14, 2014 @09:16AM (#8607186)
Connectivity and security need to be considered the same thing on the modern Internet. XP is no longer supported, and that leaves it in a pretty dangerous position. A unpatched computer isn't just a risk to the user of that computer, it becomes a risk to everybody on the net as it tries to spread its latest infection.
Re:Embracing HTTPS by tptacek on Friday November 14, 2014 @10:58AM (#8607726)
You've mistaken me for someone endorsing Windows XP. I'm not; I'm saying that the tradeoff the parent comment proposed is not the real tradeoff sites have to make.