Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by rbanffy on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @02:01PM
(#8597442)
Maximizing shareholder value would also include, I suppose, keeping the company reputation good enough so that talented people would still want to work with them and their products. That's not what happened here. I too was a Microsoft enthusiast once, but their bad behavior made me turn my back on them. Jacques and myself are certainly not alone in that decision.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by yarou on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @02:20PM
(#8597554)
In theory, yes, and these days reputation plays an extremely important role because of the massive amounts of network effects social media and the like provide. I was never a fan of Microsoft because they historically shipped substandard products. (I remember the days of windows 3.1 on my p2)
My post was merely trying to indicate that what Microsoft did in a monopoly position is not in any way unique or special. Every monopoly will behave in this manner, because corporations are rational actors.