News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Systemd-resolved DNS cache poisoning by rdtsc on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @10:19AM (#8595790)
> this is what systemd was attempting to provide

Why does systemd need to provide it? I already provides enough things.

Are there any bugs in :

http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html

I had great success using that. Both installing it on my own or run it part of Ubuntu's base install.

(And the answer of "but it already provides everything + kitchen sink, might as well provide DNS caching too" would probably not be what most people would want to hear).

Re:Systemd-resolved DNS cache poisoning by ominous_prime on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @11:25AM (#8596318)
> Why does systemd need to provide it? I already provides enough things.

I'm not saying it needs to, or trying to defend systemd. All I'm saying that systemd is providing and alternative to running another resolver.

Re:Systemd-resolved DNS cache poisoning by RexRollman on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @11:16AM (#8596244)
Because it is the Emacs of init systems.
Re:Systemd-resolved DNS cache poisoning by parfe on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @03:23PM (#8597890)
Re:Systemd-resolved DNS cache poisoning by josteink on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @01:59PM (#8597431)
Depending in your standing as far as emacs goes, that may actually be something good.

I doubt you will find anyone interpreting this as such.